WFP delegates hear from Comité Cerezo.
1. 21 years after NAFTA went into
effect, neoliberalism is still making inroads (is alive and well) in Mexico. Over
the last year or so, structural reforms were passed, which largely favor
corporate interests and privatization of public goods. During that same time,
torture, forced disappearances, arbitrary detentions and harassment have
increased. Is there any connection between the reforms and this repression?
-If you look at the Mexican states with the most land concessions to foreign companies, we see
that they are the states with the most cases of human rights violations. From
that, we can conclude that there’s a direct relation between the advancement of
neoliberalism and political violence. The states with the most extrajudicial
killings are Guerrero, Oaxaca and Chiapas.
2.
There is a long history of criminalization of social protest in Mexico: the
Dirty War, Tlatelolco, Corpus Cristi, etc. How does the current climate of
repression compare?
-In Mexico
- in 1968 and until 2000 - a single
political party ruled, the Institutional Revolutionary Party (PRI). All of the
presidents were from that party, so we could blame them for all of the serious
human rights violations during that period. We’d have to add other atrocities to the examples you
mentioned: the massacre in Aguas Blancas, Guerrero in 1995; in Acteal, Chiapas
in 1997; and in El Charco, Guerrero in 1997; etc. Today’s repression
isn’t much different, but perhaps it’s worse if we take into account the forced
disappearance of the 43 students on September 26, 2014. Another difference is
that these current atrocities are taking place within a so-called
"democracy" in which officials from at least three political parties
- the PRI, the National Action Party (PAN) and the Party of the Democratic Revolution (PRD)
- are all implicated.
3. The Mérida
Initiative is a so called US “aid” package, which Congress passed in 2007 and through
which it’s allocated more than 2.4 billion dollars. Most of its funds have been
used to purchase military equipment and train Mexican security forces. What
impact has the 8 years of this Initiative had in Mexico?
-It’s important
to mention the Summary Report of the Special Rapporteur on Torture and other Cruel,
Inhuman or Degrading Punishment, Juan E. Méndez. The Rapporteur visited Mexico
between April 21 and May 2, 2014, and concluded: "Torture is widespread in
Mexico. It occurs most frequently between the arrest and trial period, and is
used both to punish and to obtain information.” The
Rapporteur identified several causes of the weak safeguards to prevent such
mistreatment, and recommended measures to address them.
It’s hard to
imagine that US military support leads to the phenomenon that the UN Rapporteur on Torture describes, but that’s the reality we face. Add to that the
forced disappearance of 43 students and the Mexican government's refusal to
allow the Interdisciplinary Group of Independent Experts to interview members
of the army to determine more precisely what happened in Iguala, Guerrero on
September 26, 2014, when the events took place. The only thing we can say is
that the military, technological and training cooperation from the US looks
worse and worse considering the impunity around human rights violations
committed by the police and military forces against civilians.
4.
WFP’s main objective is
to change US policy in Latin America. If a genie came and granted you the
ability to change one policy, what would it be?
-Our first wish
is to end US military and police cooperation and aid, which has not brought
greater security to Mexico but has instead increased the role of the military
in police functions.
Our second
wish is that all of the money spent on weapons and training were invested in
the construction of hospitals, schools, and decent housing for the poorest
Mexicans.
Our third wish
is that the US see us as equals, that they recognize that we do everything
possible to have a better country, a more just and democratic country. If
millions of Mexicans live in the US, it’s because of the need to have a decent life, which our
own government denies us.
No comments:
Post a Comment